{"id":73424,"date":"2026-08-05T22:33:41","date_gmt":"2026-08-05T20:33:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/adiumento.local\/?page_id=73424"},"modified":"2026-08-05T22:33:41","modified_gmt":"2026-08-05T20:33:41","slug":"secure-software-lifecycle-devsecops","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/adiumento.de\/en\/themen\/regulatorik-sicher-umsetzen\/sichere-softwarebereitstellung\/secure-software-lifecycle-devsecops\/","title":{"rendered":"Secure Software Lifecycle and DevSecOps"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Sichere<\/span>

\u2190 Secure software delivery<\/a><\/p>

Secure Software Lifecycle and DevSecOps<\/h1>

Integrate security into the life cycle from the product objectives to the controlled decommissioning.<\/strong><\/p><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

A Secure Software Lifecycle (SSLC, sometimes also called SSDLC) combines security work with planning, development, build, deployment, operation and decommissioning. The abbreviations are used differently in organisations; What is meant is a security model over the life cycle. DevSecOps is its operational implementation. NIST SSDF v1.1 provides a risk-based framework for this, not a one-size-fits-all checklist or guarantee of compliance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Background<\/h2>\n\n
\"Sichere<\/figure>
\n

Software is rarely created in a single team or tool. Proprietary code, open source dependencies, build systems, cloud services and operating platforms form a supply chain. If security decisions are only checked before release, waiting times, unclear exceptions and risks that are difficult to understand arise. Likewise, weak points in the field often remain disconnected from the development process without clear feedback.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

An SSLC therefore creates binding transitions: What needs to be clarified before an architectural decision is made? What evidence belongs to a release? Who assesses risks and exceptions? How do insights from vulnerabilities, incidents and changes flow back into the product and platform?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Technical context<\/h2>\n\n

NIST organizes its Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) into four practice groups: preparing the organisation, protecting software from manipulation and unauthorized access, producing well-secured software, and responding to vulnerabilities. The practices should be integrated into existing development models, adapted to risk and continuously improved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An SSLC is therefore not a specific CI\/CD product. Git repositories, pipelines, artifact repositories, cloud or container platforms are possible implementation variants. It is crucial that security requirements, changes, approvals and documents remain consistently controllable across these variants.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

What companies need to clarify specifically<\/h2>\n\n
\"Abstrakte<\/figure>
\n